101. like a brother - Linda wrote: Was I there---No-but I am tried of Mr. Webbs name being muddied all over again--I can tell you this--me knowing him as I did I KNOW no matter how much he had drank he would NEVER have turned around with a weapon in his hand--get real--why don't you people wonder WHY the police felt they had to park their police car a quarter mile from Mr. Webbs home--is that normal precedure??I have never heard so. WHY did they have to sneak up to his home? I would have trusted living beside Rob Webb-in fact I would have felt safe knowing he was next door-these people on here that are putting him down-they feel guilty--guilty for his death (as they should) The people that called 911 on him that night probably didn't know it would lead to a death. Now they have to live with that. Also to the person that had the nerve to say that the police was called there for domestic violence--that is absolutely a lie--probably from the same neighbors!!Will Mrs. Webb win this case--probably not because of how dirty the law is in Raleigh County-They could never give her as much as she deserves-she lost a good husband and a wonderful Father-someone that never failed to help anyone he thought needed help. Robb knew more about weapons and safety then all the police put together--sure he had drank--how many of you all don't drink on a holiday--birthday. Robb Webb was worth more then to be killed by two police officers that didn't know how to do their job. BTW--check it out--a few months after Robb was murdered-the police had a stand-off with some guy on C&O Dam road--he has holding his wife hostage in their home---did they go in shotting--No--they talked him out--noone was harmed--So lets say Robb was being disorderly (which he was not) when they arrived. Why didn't they pull up at his drive-way---lights flashing--Robb would be alive today. Some of you people make me sick. Are you all so naive to really believe that police officers can not be corrupt--that they don't all stick together-and lie for each other. Go ahead --tell me how they risk their life all the time BS--they know what their job is before they accept it. Robb Webb was murdered just like Chuck Smith was murdered--only difference---Robb was drinking ---Chuck Smith was drunk and buying drugs--they both are dead. Robbs name gets muddied--Chuck Smith becomes a hero--More BS.you said that right I agree 100percent

102. greg in central va - Whatever wrote:In reference to staging the scene the paper today states that the medics had him declared dead within 5 min of arriving on scene, so how did they have time to stage anything?  From reading the posts of Linda, it appears she has her mind made up about the incident. No amount of proof or other physical evidence will change her mind. It is sad when one is blinded by preconceived notions and subsequently displays such a negative opinion of the police. For those that see, no proof is necessary. For those that don't see, no proof is sufficient.

103. know - Mr. Webb WILL NOT do it again!

104. canada_wondering - The paper and its report today actually made the cops look bad...2 medical examiners testified and they raised some ?.....even said some things the police did were very odd....they may end up it hot water over this.

105. Bogus - know wrote: Mr. Webb WILL NOT do it again! neither will Cade and Hajash after getting out of prison

106. read - Bogus wrote:neither will Cade and Hajash after getting out of prison Do any of you read? This is a CIVIL case. The widow is trying to get money. The deputies were cleared of criminal wrong doing by the prosecuting attorney a long time ago.

107. the reporters - canada wondering wrote: The paper and its report today actually made the cops look bad...2 medical examiners testified and they raised some ?.....even said some things the police did were very odd....they may end up it hot water over this.the local ME felt it was not the norm to be asked to wait to get access to the body but he did that when sheriff Moore got there he was taken to the body. It's not that he was there for any kind of life saving measures or anything, he himself stated that he is only called to a scene after death has been declared. The state ME didn't state the deputies did anything odd at all. He was a rather impartial witness. He stated the facts as he found them. Two fatal pellet wounds to the head from a single shot from the shotgun and one fatal 40 caliber bullet wound through the aorta. He also stated that either wound was fatal by themselves, let alone in combination.

108. eyeballs - you dumb shits makeing a big deal out of nothing cops kill turds all the time. what are to do when someone points a gun at you read em their rights

109. annoyed - Dumbass Detector wrote: medics had him declared dead within 5 min of arriving on scene" So they arrived at the scene 1 hour AFTER the shooting, then it took them 5 minutes to declare him dead. God did the ambulance have to come from charleston or virginia? Geez, I sure wish they would use local workers these days.You know ems workers monitor 911 calls and when the police say shots fired by law 911 has to dispatch ems to the scene to care for the wounded. Nice try. Maybe your dumbass detector was detecting you-eroor! Error!

110. informed citizen - Dumbass Detector wrote: Ok, Mr. or Ms. Dumbass-- PLEASE READ CAREFULLY WHAT YOU JUST QUOTED. READ IT AGAIN - and AGAIN. medics had him declared dead within 5 min of arriving on scene" So they arrived at the scene 1 hour AFTER the shooting, then it took them 5 minutes to declare him dead. GOT IT? GOOD. Oh, one more fine point: Medics cannot declare a person dead in WV. ONLY a MD or PA can.That was not the testimony. "Documents show shots were fired by police at 1:12 a.m., that the EMTs were toned out one minute later, and that paramedics arrived in Webb's driveway at 1:21 a.m. Three minutes after the paramedic unit arrived, Williams said, a monitor showed no signs of life, with a reading that Webb had flatlined. He said evidence will show that the combination of wounds Webb would have ruled out survival. http://www.register-herald.com/todaysfrontpag...

111. a-abbott - A grown man, three times over the legal limit for alcohol, wearing only his underwear, out in the middle of the street (a street with children I may add), waving around an AK-47.....what do you expect?? Jeez...

112. Bogus - i would expect a professional response not a hit squad. Why is Cade listed as former deputy?

113. greg in central va - informed citizen wrote: That was not the testimony. Documents show shots were fired by police at 1:12 a.m., that the EMTs were toned out one minute later, and that paramedics arrived in Webb's driveway at 1:21 a.m. Three minutes after the paramedic unit arrived, Williams said, a monitor showed no signs of life, with a reading that Webb had flatlined; He said evidence will show that the combination of wounds Webb would have ruled out survival. http://www.register-herald.com/todaysfrontpag.If I read right and the ME found a punctured aorta, I'm sure he bled out in those intervening minutes. Not to  mention the #4 buckshot in his brain.

114. the reporters - Bogus wrote: i would expect a professional response not a hit squad. Why is Cade listed as former deputy? Kade is listed as a former deputy on some news outlets because we are going off of what the reporter can scribble as quickly as possible as they sit there and then decipher when they get back to the office. They are not allowed recording devices so we must rely on notes and recollection of a lot of information flying around. LOTS of mistakes have been made by reporters since this started 5 years ago.

115. For Sure - One thing is for sure. Sheriff Tanner and the rest of his deputies have a good understanding of how many citizens do not bow and cater to his shiny badge. It appears there is a sizable element of folk who are sick and tired of the Raleigh Co. Sheriff's Department - whether it be from perceived or real acts of criminality, injustice, lack of proper representation and protection or unfairness. Wake up Raleigh Co. Commission, co-defendents - people are sick of you also.

116 meeeeeee - Tanner wasn't the sheriff when this happened. By the way, it doesn't remove the fact a grown man, drunk in his underwear, at 1:00 in the morning, was firing an assault weapon, outside his house. The officers had no way of knowing if he was shooting in the air, at the neighbors, or at his own family! I guess law enforcement should have just let him continue shooting and then added up the collateral damage when he was finished? Boy, we sure would have cried foul then, wouldn't we?

117. For Sure - meeeeeee wrote: Tanner wasn't the sheriff when this happened. By the way, it doesn't remove the fact a grown man, drunk in his underwear, at 1:00 in the morning, was firing an assault weapon, outside his house. The officers had no way of knowing if he was shooting in the air, at the neighbors, or at his own family! I guess law enforcement should have just let him continue shooting and then added up the collateral damage when he was finished? Boy, we sure would have cried foul then, wouldn't we?You have a problem inferring things people didn't say? I NEVER said Tanner was sheriff at the time of this incident. He was indeed part of the department. Danny Do-Less Moore was the sheriff at the time. I'm sure you remember Moore, and the ever increasing drug trade in Ral.Co. The negative public sentiment goes way back further than this. Lavender, Mangum, England, Mills (3ed time), French, Mills (2ed time), Thompson, Mills (1st time)-- etc etc. All have had incidents of question and less than satisfactory performance. Jail house beatings, allegations of outright lies, and other despicable acts, etc. That's MY OPIN and the OPIN of many others -whether you like it or NOT.  We think Mr. Webb, right or wrong, could have been rendered harmless a different way. For examples: more establishment of police presence, blue lights, loud speaker, tear gas, ANYTHING BUT BEING SHOT TO DEATH in front of his wife and daughter in covert darkness. IF what I say is true, and the Ral.Co. Sheriff's Dept. has such a growing negative voter element - they have no one to blame but themselves. What happens when you give a man a gun and a badge and never make him accountable to anyone BUT his own thin blue line buddies? I am not saying Mr. Webb was a saint. He was doing wrong. But that is not the issue at all. The issue is: Did the deputies handle this in the best possible manner? My opin is: NO. Were they being fired upon. NO. And I say if they had been fired upon, they would have had every right to shoot him. I know I would. Could they and should they have taken other measures to subdue him? Yes, of course. Just because my opinion is different than your, there is NO NEED to call me names, or make other childish inferences about things I didn't say. I am entitled to my opinion, just as others who post here are.  But I hope you know that POWER CORRUPTS. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Who polices the police? Only they do. Internal investigation. HAHAHAHAHA funny.  Since they have intentionally neglected to allow a citizens review board - it is us -- forum posters who will openly review them. Now you know why so many posters are upset about this incident

118. throwback - For Sure wrote: You have a problem inferring things people didn't say? I NEVER said Tanner was sheriff at the time of this incident. He was indeed part of the department. Danny Do-Less Moore was the sheriff at the time. I'm sure you remember Moore, and the ever increasing drug trade in Ral.Co. The negative public sentiment goes way back further than this. Lavender, Mangum, England, Mills (3ed time), French, Mills (2ed time), Thompson, Mills (1st time)-- etc etc. All have had incidents of question and less than satisfactory performance. Jail house beatings, allegations of outright lies, and other despicable acts, etc. That's MY OPIN and the OPIN of many others -whether you like it or NOT. We think Mr. Webb, right or wrong, could have been rendered harmless a different way. For examples: more establishment of police presence, blue lights, loud speaker, tear gas, ANYTHING BUT BEING SHOT TO DEATH in front of his wife and daughter in covert darkness. IF what I say is true, and the Ral.Co. Sheriff's Dept. has such a growing negative voter element - they have no one to blame but themselves. What happens when you give a man a gun and a badge and never make him accountable to anyone BUT his own thin blue line buddies? I am not saying Mr. Webb was a saint. He was doing wrong. But that is not the issue at all. The issue is: Did the deputies handle this in the best possible manner? My opin is: NO. Were they being fired upon. NO. And I say if they had been fired upon, they would have had every right to shoot him. I know I would. Could they and should they have taken other measures to subdue him? Yes, of course. Just because my opinion is different than your, there is NO NEED to call me names, or make other childish inferences about things I didn't say. I am entitled to my opinion, just as others who post here are. But I hope you know that POWER CORRUPTS. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Who polices the police? Only they do. Internal investigation. HAHAHAHAHA funny. Since they have intentionally neglected to allow a citizens review board - it is us -- forum posters who will openly review them. Now you know why so many posters are upset about this incident. please tell me in an adult fashion, when a man points a weapon at another, especially at a police officer, what other options are available? Im my humble opinion, there is to much television talk such as less lethal weapons that should have been used or why wasnt he shot in the legs or hands? If any one like myself that has been involved in a firearm fight (for your life) these are not realistic options.

119. meeeeee - Thank you, throwback. For Sure......where did I call you a name? When was I childish? NOT at all. Did you read the testimony of the neighbors? Mr. Webb is fortunate he hadn't been shot before. He rode an ATV, gun on top, into one woman's yard and said ,"Come here. I have a present for you. He told another he hated society and he'd have law enforcement running with their tales between their legs". In many neighborhoods, he'd have been dead long before the police showed up!! D

120 Post Removed

121. 2nd Amendment - For Sure wrote: You have a problem inferring things people didn't say? I NEVER said Tanner was sheriff at the time of this incident. He was indeed part of the department. Danny Do-Less Moore was the sheriff at the time. I'm sure you remember Moore, and the ever increasing drug trade in Ral.Co. The negative public sentiment goes way back further than this. Lavender, Mangum, England, Mills (3ed time), French, Mills (2ed time), Thompson, Mills (1st time)-- etc etc. All have had incidents of question and less than satisfactory performance. Jail house beatings, allegations of outright lies, and other despicable acts, etc. That's MY OPIN and the OPIN of many others -whether you like it or NOT. We think Mr. Webb, right or wrong, could have been rendered harmless a different way. For examples: more establishment of police presence, blue lights, loud speaker, tear gas, ANYTHING BUT BEING SHOT TO DEATH in front of his wife and daughter in covert darkness. IF what I say is true, and the Ral.Co. Sheriff's Dept. has such a growing negative voter element - they have no one to blame but themselves. What happens when you give a man a gun and a badge and never make him accountable to anyone BUT his own thin blue line buddies? am not saying Mr. Webb was a saint. He was doing wrong. But that is not the issue at all. The issue is: Did the deputies handle this in the best possible manner? My opin is: NO. Were they being fired upon. NO. And I say if they had been fired upon, they would have had every right to shoot him. I know I would. Could they and should they have taken other measures to subdue him? Yes, of course. Just because my opinion is different than your, there is NO NEED to call me names, or make other childish inferences about things I didn't say. I am entitled to my opinion, just as others who post here are. But I hope you know that POWER CORRUPTS. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Who polices the police? Only they do. Internal investigation. HAHAHAHAHA funny. Since they have intentionally neglected to allow a citizens review board - it is us -- forum posters who will openly review them. Now you know why so many posters are upset about this incident.So let me get this straight....only if the deputies were being fired upon first would you deem it necessary/acceptable to shoot back? The deputies don't/didn't have to wait for him to fire first. When the deputies felt that their lives or the lives of others were in danger of serious harm or death they were permitted to use deadly force. You don't have to be fired upon to feel in grave danger. When he turned around and shouldered that cocked and locked Ak-47...the deputies had the jump on him and shot first. Let's say he didn't have a rifle-but instead something that didn't shoot bullets: a knife/sword/hatchet. Would it have been any less dangerous-no. Police presence, blue lights and loud speaker do not defeat a drunk man with a gun that shoots 7.62 ammo. A shotgun n handgun do. You don't bring a tazer/siren/blue lights/tear gas to a gun fight.

122. everywhere - Woolineyes wrote: I don't have a problem with law enforcement. Maybe those that do need to be shot. Why was the law there in the first place? They don't come to my house with weapons drawn. Must be a reason for that don't you think? A person must need some help or they would not be called out in the first place. Where was the state in all of this? They are the ones that need to be there. Thats why we pay taxes. When was the last time you saw a state police car? When you drove past the SPHQs? Why was the law there in the first place, why because of nosy ass neighbors that had it out for him. I only see that the neighbor was the one that killed him for sticking her nose where it shouldn't had been.

123. throwback - everywhere wrote: Why was the law there in the first place, why because of nosy ass neighbors that had it out for him. I only see that the neighbor was the one that killed him for sticking her nose where it shouldn't had been.be that as it may, I will say she did have a right to call over this type of behavior, but when the police arrived, they are already on high alert because the call was dispatched that a man was shooting a gun into his own home. if i was law enforcement, that would scare me because if a man would shoot at his family he will shoot others.. and thats all the info they had to go on.

124. Heard-enough - throwback wrote: be that as it may, I will say she did have a right to call over this type of behavior, but when the police arrived, they are already on high alert because the call was dispatched that a man was shooting a gun into his own home. if i was law enforcement, that would scare me because if a man would shoot at his family he will shoot others.. and thats all the info they had to go on.throwback: You are 100% right. The man was firing a weapon within 500 ft. Of a dwelling, thats against the law. Firing a weapon is also dangerous, The bullets fall back to earth. How far do people think an AK-47 is dangerous when fired in the air? A 22 rifle is dangerous for 1 1/2 miles. How many people was he endangering? If a man points a weapon at me I am not waiting to see if he pulls the trigger. It becomes kill or be killed. I think these law enforcement officers were right. I don`t think they want to get killed either. There is no excuse for this mans actions in a populated area. Thats just the way it is. You point a weapon at someone you will probably get shot if they are armed. That is common sense.

125. meeeeeee - Hey, everywhere give me your address. I'll come tonight and stand within 30 ft. of your house and fire an assault weapon. It'll be dark, so you won't be able to tell if I'm firing into the air, into your house, or into another house. Wonder if you'll be the "nosy-ass neighbors" that call it in? Will you say with certainty, Oh, he's just firing into the air. He isn't hurting anything? Or will you shoot me for endangering your life and the lives of others? Let's see if you think it's OK when it's your home, family, and property. People like you, with your hatred of the cops, your conspiracy theory and your BS about rights never seem to get it

126. post - Truth is the police dept will never be liked no matter what they do or don't do. They'll always be wrong in peoples eyes. Had the man shot and killed/ hurt someone you people would be on here saying the police should have SHOT the man before he killed or hurt someone! Mr Webb was in the wrong! He should not have fires the gun! As a matter if fact, he was setting off illegal fireworks! He was drunk in public doing all this. He thought it was funny. Never one time thought of anyone else other than himself. He was a grown ass man acting like a child. Its either shoot or be shot! The police did what they felt they should do to save others and themselves. They are trained for a reason!I do not feel like the family is due any money and they will not win this in court. All they are doing is waisting the tax money! When they lose they should have to pay all court fees! It's sad when people waste money to make a dollar off a dead man any way.

127. heights - I'd like to see the police in Cabell Heights more often! They could write tickets all day and night! Maybe even bust a couple drug dealers while they're at it! Cabell Heights is a mess. Always that drunk crack head lady trying to jump in front of a moving car! Coalminers driving to fast using this as a short cut to ICG is a problem to. I've lived on Cherry Tree for 8 years now. I welcome the police! Drive through any time!

128. Verizon user - heights wrote: I'd like to see the police in Cabell Heights more often! They could write tickets all day and night! Maybe even bust a couple drug dealers while they're at it! Cabell Heights is a mess. Always that drunk crack head lady trying to jump in front of a moving car! Coalminers driving to fast using this as a short cut to ICG is a problem to. I've lived on Cherry Tree for 8 years now. I welcome the police! Drive through any time! Sorry, but you won't see a deputy in Cabell Heights or on Cherry Tree in your lifetime. They have been called many times on the Red Ford truck speeding up and down Cherry Tree Dr. but they won't show. Reckless and wanton endangerment of the public is what that idiot driver is guilty of, but we get no police protection. All they would need to do is sit out here some morning or late evening to see him go down the street scream his loud truck and sliding his tires, without stopping at a stop sign. Yet, all we get from Sheriff Tanner is our property Taxes Due Statement. Pay up, or get a penalty.

129. everywhere - meeeeeee wrote: Hey, everywhere give me your address. I'll come tonight and stand within 30 ft. of your house and fire an assault weapon. It'll be dark, so you won't be able to tell if I'm firing into the air, into your house, or into another house. Wonder if you'll be the nosy-ass neighbors that call it in? Will you say with certainty, "Oh, he's just firing into the air. He isn't hurting anything!? Or will you shoot me for endangering your life and the lives of others? Let's see if you think it's OK when it's your home, family, and property. People like you, with your hatred of the cops, your ;conspiracy theory and your BS about rights never seem to get it.I don't think I said anything about hating cops. Come on down to Sophia, I live close to the old high school, sorry but I can't tell you exactly where I live my daddy would get mad at me for telling a stranger, who knows you might be a prevert. Like I said come on down I like seeing excitement, because we have nosy ass neighbors also. Maybe dad will let me shoot right along with.

130. meeeeeee - Sophia.....might have known. You're probably one of the idiots that eggs cars in front of the Chinese restaurant. Let's chase business away from the one place that actually keeps a steady flow of customers.

131. poster - Verizon User wrote: Sorry, but you won't see a deputy in Cabell Heights or on Cherry Tree in your lifetime. They have been called many times on the Red Ford truck speeding up and down Cherry Tree Dr. but they won't show. Reckless and wanton endangerment of the public is what that idiot driver is guilty of, but we get no police protection. All they would need to do is sit out here some morning or late evening to see him go down the street scream his loud truck and sliding his tires, without stopping at a stop sign. Yet, all we get from Sheriff Tanner is our property Taxes Due Statement. Pay up, or get a penalty.wanton endangerment is with a firearm...you know like webb was doing

132. Verizon user - poster wrote: wanton endangerment is with a firearm...you know like webb was doing really now-- WANTON: Grossly careless or negligent; reckless; malicious. The term wanton implies a reckless disregard for the consequences of one's behavior. A wanton act is one done in heedless disregard for the life, limbs, health, safety, reputation, or property rights of another individual. Such an act is more than Negligence or gross negligence; it is equivalent in its results to an act of willful misconduct. A wanton injury is one precipitated by a conscious and intentional wrongful act or by an omission of a known obligation with reckless indifference to potential harmful consequences. West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. By the way, there is no copyright infringement since this material is used for educational purposes and not for profit.

133. justcause - For Sure wrote: You have a problem inferring things people didn't say? I NEVER said Tanner was sheriff at the time of this incident. He was indeed part of the department. Danny Do-Less Moore was the sheriff at the time. I'm sure you remember Moore, and the ever increasing drug trade in Ral.Co. The negative public sentiment goes way back further than this. Lavender, Mangum, England, Mills (3ed time), French, Mills (2ed time), Thompson, Mills (1st time)-- etc etc. All have had incidents of question and less than satisfactory performance. Jail house beatings, allegations of outright lies, and other despicable acts, etc. That's MY OPIN and the OPIN of many others -whether you like it or NOT. We think Mr. Webb, right or wrong, could have been rendered harmless a different way. For examples: more establishment of police presence, blue lights, loud speaker, tear gas, ANYTHING BUT BEING SHOT TO DEATH in front of his wife and daughter in covert darkness. IF what I say is true, and the Ral.Co. Sheriff's Dept. has such a growing negative voter element - they have no one to blame but themselves. What happens when you give a man a gun and a badge and never make him accountable to anyone BUT his own thin blue line buddies? I am not saying Mr. Webb was a saint. He was doing wrong. But that is not the issue at all. The issue is: Did the deputies handle this in the best possible manner? My opin is: NO. Were they being fired upon. NO. And I say if they had been fired upon, they would have had every right to shoot him. I know I would. Could they and should they have taken other measures to subdue him? Yes, of course. Just because my opinion is different than your, there is NO NEED to call me names, or make other childish inferences about things I didn't say. I am entitled to my opinion, just as others who post here are. But I hope you know that POWER CORRUPTS. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Who polices the police? Only they do. Internal investigation. HAHAHAHAHA funny. Since they have intentionally neglected to allow a citizens review board - it is us -- forum posters who will openly review them. Now you know why so many posters are upset about this incident.it wasnt in front of his wife or daughter. wife reportedly came out afterward...children never came out...they were asleep

134. 2nd Amendment - Verizon User wrote: really now--  WANTON: Grossly careless or negligent; reckless; malicious. The term wanton implies a reckless disregard for the consequences of one's behavior. A wanton act is one done in heedless disregard for the life, limbs, health, safety, reputation, or property rights of another individual. Such an act is more than Negligence or gross negligence; it is equivalent in its results to an act of willful misconduct. A wanton injury is one precipitated by a conscious and intentional wrongful act or by an omission of a known obligation with reckless indifference to potential harmful consequences. West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. By the way, there is no copyright infringement since this material is used for educational purposes and not for profit.WV state code:94;167;61-3E-10. Wanton endangerment involving destructive devices, explosive materials or incendiary devices; penalty. Any person who wantonly performs any act with a destructive device, explosive material or incendiary device which creates substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury to another shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be committed to the custody of the division of corrections for not less than two years nor more than ten years or fined not more than ten thousand dollars, or both. The best you have on ol' Bo & Luke duke in the red pickup is reckless driving.

135. Litter Patrol man - So lets kill everyone and blame it on everything but bad judgement, heaven forbid, all we have is a trash problem in this county according to Sheriff Tanner.

136. greg in central va - Heard-Enough wrote: throwback: You are 100% right.The man was firing a weapon within 500 ft. Of a dwelling, thats against the law. Firing a weapon is also dangerous, The bullets fall back to earth. How far do people think an AK-47 is dangerous when fired in the air? A 22 rifle is dangerous for 1 1/2 miles. How many people was he endangering? If a man points a weapon at me I am not waiting to see if he pulls the trigger. It becomes kill or be killed. I think these law enforcement officers were right. I don`t think they want to get killed either. There is no excuse for this mans actions in a populated area. Thats just the way it is. You point a weapon at someone you will probably get shot if they are armed. That is common sense.Exactly right my friend but at the end of the day, these cop hating fringe elements are all big and bad on here. Faced with a similar situation, most would cry like a little girl. Bottom line is, police can do nothing right in their eyes. Nothing is ever good enough for them. Collateral damage done by allowing this drunken idiot to continue his rampage could have had deadly consequences to INNOCENT people. THEN the cops would have been derelict in their duty for not stopping the fool beforehand. Cops can't win, can't tie and can't even quit the game.

137. post - greg in central va wrote: Exactly right my friend but at the end of the day, these cop hating fringe elements are all big and bad on here. Faced with a similar situation, most would cry like a little girl. Bottom line is, police can do nothing right in their eyes. Nothing is ever good enough for them. Collateral damage done by allowing this drunken idiot to continue his rampage could have had deadly consequences to INNOCENT people. THEN the cops would have been derelict in their duty for not stopping the fool beforehand. Cops can't win, can't tie and can't even quit the gameI agree. I posted kind of the same feeling earlier.

138. conservative Christian - When you shoot a bullet into the air you are endangering everyone in the vicinity. That bullet has to come down somewhere. Would you want to have one of your children or grandchildren hit in the head with a bullet returning to the ground from someone shooting their gun in the air? I wouldn't.

139. logic - The fact that this man pointed a weapon at police officers, something that the family even had to admit because Kades buckshot had skid down along its barrel and embedded some, really is all the information I need to hear. All of the rest of his poor behaviors are just extra.When you aim a gun at police, you better be prepared for the worst possible outcome.

140. know - Bogus: Can you not read or comprehend. This is a civil case, not criminal. Do you know the difference? I doubt it. You don't know how to spell Kade. Anyway, as I stated Mr. Webb WILL NOT do it again.

141. cupcake - This is my opinion. I know Mrs Webb, knew Rob and her children. I also know both police officers. Im not friends with any involved but do know who they are. First its his right to own whatever type of gun he wants but with rights you have responsibilities. You can not danger people and shooting anything that close to houses are dangerous period. Second drinking and firearms dont mix when you involve those 2 things bad things happen. We dont drink and drive cars because its affects our judgement. I imagine its the same with weapons. He put himself in a bad situation by the choices he made that night. The deputys got that call. During the drive there their mind had to be racing and assuming the worst. Cops always see the worse. A ak-47 is scary and any person seeing someone armed with such a weapon or any weapon for that matter would be scared. Im not saying anyone deserved to die but if I drink and drive my car and wreck and kill myself or others I chose that. Is it terrible yes are people sad yes but it happens everyday. Did the people killed deserve that of course not but sometimes bad things happen. Everyone on here could see an accident and we could all have different opinions on how it was handeled because of our preception. I am sure Mrs Webb is hurt, im sure her children hurt but if my family was the officers responding to that call I would have wanted to hear they fired first. Good or bad about the 2 officers very few people can take a life and be ok about it. I dont think thats the case for these 2 guys. Mrs Webb is now a single parent, she is angry, and worried like all moms or dads would be. Regardless if he was a good or bad husband she loved him, she stayed with him. When someone dies we all want to blame something for the reason. Its her right to question what happened but I dont believe the police officers did anything out of cold heartdness and this suit shouldnt go anywhere. Its sad and instead of blaming and arguing we should pray and support the kids left and pray for all the people suffering. The officers and their family included. To me this was just a case of incrediable bad luck, a tragic accident, but the county is not to blame and money should not be paid out. There are no right answers to this situation.

142. everywhere - greg in central va wrote:  Exactly right my friend but at the end of the day, these cop hating fringe elements are all big and bad on here. Faced with a similar situation, most would cry like a little girl. Bottom line is, police can do nothing right in their eyes. Nothing is ever good enough for them. Collateral damage done by allowing this drunken idiot to continue his rampage could have had deadly consequences to INNOCENT people. THEN the cops would have been derelict in their duty for not stopping the fool beforehand. Cops can't win, can't tie and can't even quit the game.B.S. 3/4 of the cops are dirtier than dirt.

143. thehammer - everywhere wrote: B.S. 3/4 of the cops are dirtier than dirt.there must be a cop pounding your old lady....just remember....ONCE IT GOES IN, IT WILL NEVER COME OUT!!

144. everywhere - thehammer wrote: there must be a cop pounding your old lady....just remember....ONCE IT GOES IN, IT WILL NEVER COME OUT!! You said it..........and I also said cops are dirtier than dirt.....point proven right because you seem to know how they are or maybe you too.

145. rodman - cops aint shit without weapons i would fold kade like a dish rag and hajash is just gay

146, Ash Lee - blue press wrote: was your brother-in-law firing his weapon within the legal distance to do so? there are laws against firing a weapon within a certain distance of a roadway, residence, and school. it doesn't matter about his property and backyard if you do not have the proper, legal distance. what would have happened if your brother-in-law's stray bullet accidentally killed a child that night? freedoms go both ways, and we have the freedom to enjoy our yards and homes without dodging bullets from drunk neighbors!  Amen! You said it all!

147. haha - Why don't You go tell them to their face instead of a nameless website.

148. RMN - Not guilty !

149. yea - No comments since the cops were found Not Guilty?

150. meeeeeeee - Well, I guess a jury of local citizens didn't believe the police were in the wrong. I guess, according to some posters, that's all due to corruption and crooked police. What a waste of taxpayer time and money! Moral: Laws are in place to keep citizens safe. If you violate them, you may pay the ultimate penalty!