A complaint filed on May 5, 2008, instituting 
civil action, against the Raleigh County 
Sheriff's Department, the Raleigh County 
Commission, Sheriff Danny Moore, Chief 
Deputy Steve Tanner, Deputy Greg S Kade 
and John E Hajash for the wrongful death 
of her husband on July 4, 2006. Jurisdiction 
changed to the federal court system 
eighteen months later when counsel for the 
widow filed an amended complaint 
asserting a civil rights claim and Case #08-
C-406(B) was removed from the Raleigh 
County Circuit Court docket and transferred 
as Case #5:09-CV-01253 to the U.S. 
District Court Docket on Nov 16, 2009.
Michael Olivio and Travis Griffith 
represented the widow in this civil action 
and the defendant’s counsel were Chip 
Williams, Wesley V Queen, law firm of 
Pullin, Fowler, Flanagan, Brown, PLLC. and 
Kermit Moore.
Court documents 1-0 thru 1-12 detail the 
original complaint, summons and amended 
complaint.
                           Civil Trial
After several continued court dates, the civil 
trial took place on July 11, 2011. Judge 
Irene Berger presided on this district court 
case that ended on July 18, 2011.
The opening defense statement included 
Chip Williams holding a weapon and 
claiming to the jury that it was not an issue 
if Rob had a weapon aimed at the deputies 
because that was already a stipulated fact 
between the parties. Document #135 was 
labeled Remark but was actually a hand 
written letter filed July 18, 2011 that 
stipulated that Rob was holding a weapon.
Justice was not served in this courtroom.
District Court Daily Trial Logs
July 11, 2011
July 12, 2011
July 13, 2011
July 14, 2011
July 15, 2011
July 18, 2011
Court Documents - Top 5 Views
31-1 Exhibits A-F
77-5 Transcript
75-3 Statements
135 Remark / Stipulation
64-2 Partial transcript
Other Information
Court Documents Table
PACER Receipt
The Jury
Civil Case History
Trial exhibits
         
        The Court notes that the statements in 
the deputies’ deposition indicating Mr. 
Webb raised his gun to his right 
shoulder were not assertions by the 
deputies, but rather, in both cases, 
leading questions that went undenied. 
See, supra, nn. 10-11
This is located in Document #84 page 21 
of the judge’s summary judgment.
         
        Plaintiff's Question #18
Set forth fully and in detail your 
recollection of the facts which led to the 
fatal shooting of Robert Webb on or 
about July 4, 2006. Describe all facts as 
you recall then from the time you began 
your shift until such time that you left 
Robert Webb's residence following the 
incident.
Defendant's Answer:
Objection, this interrogatory exceeds the 
maximum allowable number of 
interrogatories set forth in Rule 33(a) of 
the West Virginia Rules of Civil 
Procedure which defines that parties 
involved in litigation are only allowed a 
maximum number of 40 interrogatories, 
including all discreet subparts. 
Additionally, this Defendant believes that 
this interrogatory is not being made 
consistent with the principals outlined in 
Rule 26(b) of the West Virginia Rules of 
Civil Procedure and may be subject to 
sanctions under Rule 11 of the West 
Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure.
        
        
        ©2014 Justice4RobWebb.com
       All Rights Reserved
        
        Justice 4 Rob Webb
        
        Civil Action